Discover
Understand the problem, objectives, stakeholders, and constraints.
Typically: A shared, written statement of the problem and its context.
Our approach
Technology is the implementation. Strategy is the advantage.
Why Chavery
The difference is in where the work begins and what it commits to before any code is written.
| Topic | Conventional development approach | Chavery’s strategic approach |
|---|---|---|
| Where it starts | A list of requested features. | The underlying problem. |
| What it focuses on | Implementation. | The domain and the business context, then implementation. |
| How it is structured | Can produce disconnected modules. | The architecture is designed before implementation begins. |
| How it treats the process | May overlook the underlying business process. | Workflows, data, security and functionality are aligned. |
| Where it ends | Often treats delivery as the end of the engagement. | Builds for maintainability, scalability and practical outcomes. |
This is a difference in methodology, not a statement about any other firm. Many capable teams work this way too; the point is what Chavery commits to doing before it writes code.
Engagement model
Six stages. Each ends with something you can read, question and approve before the next begins.
Let’s talk
Start a Strategic ConversationTell us the challenge. We will start with the problem, not a list of features.